Decomp Physical Model

 

 

 

SAFER does not believe that any plan that starts with the backfilling   of the WCA canals, this early in the process, falls

within the philosophy of adaptive management.”

                            

SAFER Position Paper      

                                “The Case Against Backfilling” Aug, 2008

   

DECOMP* Adaptive Management Plan

 DAMP - January 2006

*DECOMP is the CERP project entitled: Decompartmentalization and Enhanced Sheetflow for WCA-3.

 

 

What is DECOMP? 

DECOMP is the “keystone” of Everglades Restoration. To significantly enhance the environmental conditions of the Everglades, DECOMP will provide a continuous flow of clean water at the northern reaches of WCA-3A and an ecologically robust pathway for this flow across both the central and southern Everglades. The DECOMP process was put on hold in early 2005 for the reason that current computer models do not adequately address some of the important ecological responses to Decompartmentalization, nor do they address some important stakeholder concerns about canal backfilling.

 What is the DAMP?

 DAMP is a science-based, cooperative, multi-agency plan for combining data mining, historical analysis, physical models, and evaluation tools for finding the best restoration design for the DECOMP project without compromising water supply or flood control.  It is a common sense, fiscally responsible pilot study to address Section 601(h)(3) in WRDA 2000, which states that CERP will use Adaptive Management to reduce uncertainties and incorporate new information into planning, implementation and operation of the restoration effort. 

 What is adaptive management for DAMP?

Adaptive management can be very generally described as “learning by doing” and as such, for the DECOMP project it is an organized means of identifying and reducing key uncertainties, allowing managers to move forward in the face of limited knowledge. Several key questions for DECOMP include:

a.       How do levees and levee modifications affect sheetflow, ridge and slough landscape structure and function, and Everglades vegetation and wildlife?

b.      What are the differential effects of partial versus more extensive backfilling of canals on hydrology, sediment, vegetation, and wildlife?

 Why was WCA-3B selected as the site for the DAMP Physical Model?

 Basically, WCA-3B was selected as the site of a physical model by an interagency DAMP design team because its orientation, hydrology, and ecological history addressed the broadest range of questions with the greatest amount of scientific rigor.WCA-3B is a region of the Everglades with the greatest amount of scientific uncertainty and the largest amount of relevance for other regions.

 As the “middle-of-the-center” of DECOMP, WCA-3B is the key to the recovery of the historic flow pattern of the central and southern Everglades, aerial increase of slough in 3B, preventing seepage into commercial regions, restoring hydroperiods and flows to Shark River Slough, and creating healthy salinity patterns in Florida Bay. At the same time, it is not clear how tree islands in 3B will respond to deeper waters, or how the L-67 canals might support exotic fish, or whether sediment transport is the mechanism that must be restored to restore microtopography to 3B.

 What are the risks associated the DAMP?

 DAMP could be perceived by the public as a delay and lack of commitment to DECOMP by the Corps and the District. There could be cries from concerned citizens that the Corps “already knows enough” and that the Corps can proceed with DECOMP “by just restoring the natural hydrology.” There is some truth to these claims and that is why the Corps has made it clear to the public and other agencies that DAMP will accelerate ecological benefits by addressing current landscape uncertainties so that DECOMP can maximize the “bang-for-the-buck.”

A second risk of the DAMP is potential misuse and misinterpretation of short-term results from the 5-year physical model.   The physical model for DAMP is being implemented in an environment that still includes significant constraints on hydrologic parameters such as flow and stage. Therefore, interpretation of the results of the DAMP physical model needs to take into account the known constrained environment

 

 
 

Decomp Physical Model - January 30, 2009