SAFER's Comments on the Revisions to the
1992
General Design Memorandum
We want to thank the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE) and the South Florida Water Management
District (SFWMD) for the opportunity to review the proposed
revisions to the 1992 General Design Memorandum (GDM) on
Modified Water Deliveries (MWD) to Everglades National Park
(ENP).
In the letter dated March 16, 2004,
initiating the scoping process, the Corps proposes to
replace the three gated structures on the L-67A canal, of
the original 1992 plan, with fixed crest weirs, “in order to
be more consistent with the present philosophy on Everglades
restoration that emphasizes passive methods of water
management.” At first glance, this decision would seem to be
beneficial to the interests of the recreational anglers
utilizing the Water Conservation Area 3A canals. Doing away
with the expensive structures would cut back on the
disruption caused by extended construction time, and would
not require the building of small boat by-pass channels.
Another restriction to navigation, the discharge conveyance
channels and their tieback levees, that would carry the
water from WCA 3A to 3B, would not be required. It was these
interceptor levees, extending across the pocket between
L-67A and L-67C that would block boat traffic eight miles up
the canal.
It took hard lobbying by the Miami-based
Fisherman Against the Destruction of the Everglades (FADE),
stayed the Corps of Engineers’ hand at that particular time,
but the organizational culture that supported the closure of
the L-67C canal to anglers, has remained in place. The new
proposal continues to stress, as the core of the plan, the
disruption of boat traffic at the same point as the 1992 GDM:
“It is proposed to replace the
S-345 structures…and remove the approximate 8 miles
of
the L-67C levee that is directly downgradient from the three weirs…[The] levee would
be
scraped down to marsh elevation and the removed
material placed into the adjacent L-67
canal. The
weir locations and the L-67C degradation would
coincide with the locations
specified in the 1992
plan for corresponding features.”
SAFER believes that the goals of
establishing the necessary sheetflow of water that
scientists maintain is needed for Everglades Restoration,
can be accomplished by degrading the levees, and plugging
the canals, but not backfilling them. The canals become
obstacles to sheetflow only if they are used a means of
conveying water. As of now, there is no scientific proof
available that filling in the canals is necessary. All the
hydrological modeling that has been conducted by the SFWMD
start with the premise of backfilling the canals to achieve
sheetflow. SAFER is looking for the District to conduct
hydrological modeling which leaves the canals in place.
SAFER’s position is summed up in the
“Modified Water Delivery Consensus Report” published by the
Recreational Issues Workshop of SFWMD’s Water Resources
Advisory Commission:
The purpose of the Mod Water
Project is to provide more natural water deliveries
to
ENP…The Team discussed the challenge of
maintaining the conveyance necessary
for restoration
while providing recreational opportunities. Mod
Water proposes, as
does the CERP, backfilling some
canals. Recreational fishermen, bass fishermen in
particular, are seeking solutions that maintain the
quality of the existing fisheries
within the canals.
The Team is seeking ways to do a better job of
maintaining and
improving existing recreation while
achieving restoration.
The chart below clearly shows the extent
to which construction of the proposed plan will affect canal
closures:
|
L-67C Canal Boat Access |
CSOP Target Dates |
|
Project Plan |
Accessible to Boats |
Plan Item |
Completion Date |
|
Current |
20.5 miles |
Modeling, evaluation,
NEPA |
April, 2004 |
|
USACE (w/backfill) |
7.5 |
Design refinements |
October 2004 |
|
ENP |
0 |
Construction starts |
August 2005 |
|
USACE (w/o backfill) |
15.5 miles |
Construction complete |
June 2006 |
Attachments:
- Memo to Rock Salt, 1/19/2004, SAFER’s Comments
on the CSOP PDT Meeting
- Modified Water Delivery Consensus Report, 9/17/2003,
Recreational Issues Workshop, Water Resources Advisory
Commission, South Florida Water Management District